Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 24 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 26 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 30 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Trip Over for Trip Up - by caz 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Fiver 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by caz 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by caz 1 hour ago.
Pub Talk: There'll always be an England..... - by caz 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - (17 posts)
Witnesses: Time poll - (9 posts)
Pub Talk: There'll always be an England..... - (6 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - (3 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (3 posts)
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - (2 posts)


Jack the Ripper: End of a Legend
Calum Reuben Knight
Athena Press, 2005
Softcover. 316pp
ISBN: 1844014843

Casebook Review:

A strange book which straddles the line between fact and fiction. As fiction, it actually succeeds and is quite readable. But as non-fiction - it is, after all, marketed as "True Crime" - it ranks as one of the most implausible Ripper theories ever to hit the market. Through a series of improbably arcane and convoluted anagrams, Knight purports to show that "Jack the Ripper" was actually three people - George Hutchinson, Joseph Barnett, and Mary Jane Kelly. Knight trots out marriage entries and census records to support his argument, but none of them are convincing.

If this book had been written and marketed as fiction, it would have garnered a much better recommendation. Knight has an excellent command of language and his writing style is both readable and evocative. But as non-fiction, the book falls flat. Not recommended.