Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

"London's Scariest Mysteries" (LWT)... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » Books, Films and Other Media » Television Programmes » "London's Scariest Mysteries" (LWT) « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Phillips
Detective Sergeant
Username: Cgp100

Post Number: 66
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Saturday, May 24, 2003 - 6:10 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Last night London Weekend Television showed a half-hour documentary on Jack the Ripper as part of its "London's Scariest Mysteries" series.

Four main suspects were presented: Aaron Kosminksy, Walter Sickert, Sir William Gull and James Maybrick.

Much of the content was from "talking heads" Paul Begg, Donald Rumbelow, Melvyn Fairclough and Shirley Harrison.

As the list of prime suspects suggests, nothing novel was presented in the way of evidence or interpretation. Though the programme was short, that didn't prevent some surprising blunders, such as confusing the Lusk letter with the Openshaw letter.

The conclusion was that we still don't know who the Ripper was!

Just thought it might be worth leaving a record of the programme here for future reference.

Chris Phillips

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Caroline Anne Morris
Detective Sergeant
Username: Caz

Post Number: 102
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 - 5:31 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

'The conclusion was that we still don't know who the Ripper was!'

Well, Chris, that's a relief isn't it? Anything that serves to educate the public away from thinking anyone has cleared up one of London's scariest mysteries (the clue is in the prog's title), with their preferred solution, has to be a move in the right direction, I think.

However, I wasn't keen on the impression the narration may have given that there were only four suspects to examine (or at least worth examining), one of these being the ripper, despite the fact that, one by one, they were all stamped 'Not Proven'.

Love,

Caz

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.