What’s in a Word or Two?
In his debut Editorial for the Rip, Don Souden questions the merits of certain key phrases in our Ripper vocabulary.
As Far as Mitre Square
Neil Bell and Jake Luukanen look at the Square through the eyes of those who were there.
The Victorian Autopsy
In Part I, Karyo Magellan examines dissection in the pursuit of the cause of death.
Andy Aliffe follows a ‘soiled dove’ from London’s East End to America’s Old West.
Taking a Stride Down Berner Street
Gavin Bromley returns to Smith’s Beat.
Chris Scott returns with more nuggets from old newspapers, this time concentrating on Mitre Square.
The Last Word
Christopher-Michael DiGrazia studies necrophilia and cloning in the name of research.
News and Views
I Beg to Report
From Edwin Brough to Hugo Chavez... if it happened, you’ll find it here.
I Beg to Report: Talks on Druitt and Wimborne
David Andersen visits the birthplace of M J Druitt.
I Beg to Report: UK Conference 2007
Exclusive news of next year’s event from Conference Administrator Claudia Aliffe.
Tom Wescott offers his appraisal of Gavin Bromley’s Smith’s Beat in Rip 70.
On the Crimebeat
Wilf Gregg dips into the weird world of true crime to find the best in murder and mayhem.
Stewart Evans and Don Rumbelow tell us about their forthcoming opus Jack the Ripper: Scotland Yard Investigates, plus notice of future goodies coming your way.
We would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance given by the following people in the production of this issue of Ripperologist: David Andersen, Michael Echols, DDS, Stewart Evans, Donald Rumbelow, Stephen Ryder, and Eduardo Zinna. Thank you!
The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of Ripperologist or its editors. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Ripperologist and its editorial team.
We occasionally use material we believe has been placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of something we have published we will be pleased to make a proper acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 71 (September 2006), including the compilation of all materials and the unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2006 Ripperologist. The authors of signed articles, essays, letters, news reports, reviews and other items retain the copyright of their respective contributions. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise circulated in any form or by any means, including digital, electronic, printed, mechanical, photocopying, recording or any other, without the prior permission in writing of Ripperologist. The unauthorised reproduction or circulation of this publication or any part thereof, whether for monetary gain or not, is strictly prohibited and may constitute copyright infringement as defined in domestic laws and international agreements and give rise to civil liability and criminal prosecution.