Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
Annie Chapman: Richardson's View - by harry 27 minutes ago.
Annie Chapman: Richardson's View - by Curious Cat 2 hours ago.
Other Mysteries: DES Drama - Dennis Neilson - by OneRound 3 hours ago.
Levy, Jacob: Jacob the Ripper - by Herlock Sholmes 3 hours ago.
Annie Chapman: Richardson's View - by Observer 3 hours ago.
Annie Chapman: Richardson's View - by Observer 3 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: The Two Pawn Tickets - by Curious Cat 3 hours ago.
Annie Chapman: Richardson's View - by Abby Normal 4 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Annie Chapman: Richardson's View - (35 posts)
Witnesses: Cadosch: Dismissed For Being Cautious? - (17 posts)
Catherine Eddowes: The Two Pawn Tickets - (8 posts)
Levy, Jacob: Jacob the Ripper - (7 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: The apron was dropped... - (5 posts)
Pub Talk: Springsteen's New Album - (2 posts)


Jack the Ripper: End of a Legend
Calum Reuben Knight
Athena Press, 2005
Softcover. 316pp
ISBN: 1844014843

Casebook Review:

A strange book which straddles the line between fact and fiction. As fiction, it actually succeeds and is quite readable. But as non-fiction - it is, after all, marketed as "True Crime" - it ranks as one of the most implausible Ripper theories ever to hit the market. Through a series of improbably arcane and convoluted anagrams, Knight purports to show that "Jack the Ripper" was actually three people - George Hutchinson, Joseph Barnett, and Mary Jane Kelly. Knight trots out marriage entries and census records to support his argument, but none of them are convincing.

If this book had been written and marketed as fiction, it would have garnered a much better recommendation. Knight has an excellent command of language and his writing style is both readable and evocative. But as non-fiction, the book falls flat. Not recommended.