Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Pub Talk: App That Warns Loved Ones if You Watch Porn a Hit with Christian Right in the US - by FISHY1118 2 minutes ago.
Pub Talk: App That Warns Loved Ones if You Watch Porn a Hit with Christian Right in the US - by caz 10 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Janie Oliver / Ten Bells - by mpriestnall 37 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - by Geddy2112 1 hour ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - by Geddy2112 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - by FrankO 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - by FrankO 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - by The Rookie Detective 1 hour ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (20 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Bucks Row Scenarios - (17 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - (15 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - (12 posts)
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - (9 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: The Missing Evidence II - New Ripper Documentary - Aug 2024 - (7 posts)


Bowling Green University Press, 1987 (softcover)
Age of Sex Crime, The
Caputi, Jane
Ohio: Bowling Green University Press. 1987.
246pp. Illustrated, Index. [Partial Ripper Content]
ISBN: 0879723866

Casebook Review:

Much of Caputi's Age of Sex Crime is either devoted to the Ripper, or spent in comparing the actions of modern males to those of the Ripper (if only figuratively). Her thesis is more or less that the idea of "Jack the Ripper" is an encapsulation of all the hatred and jealousy men subconsciously harbor toward women - hence the perpetuation of the myth through to the modern day. Her work has a great deal of merit, but is marred by several hyper-feminist precepts which can only be classified as "anti-male." Nevertheless, a very different and scholarly feminist perspective. Recommended.