Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Herlock Sholmes 12 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was Tabram The Key? - by Herlock Sholmes 22 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 1 hour ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Left or right handed. - by Darryl Kenyon 1 hour ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was Tabram The Key? - by Holmes' Idiot Brother 3 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was Tabram The Key? - by Fiver 6 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Fiver 8 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was Tabram The Key? - by Filby 9 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Suspect Discussion: Had The Ripper A Beard ?! - (45 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - (29 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Polly's Skirts - Lechmere The Killer. - (12 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: Left or right handed. - (9 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Lechmere/Cross "name issue" Part 2 - (8 posts)
Witnesses: If I were the killer… - (5 posts)


St. Martin's Press, 1995 (Hardcover)
Sin, Organized Charity, and the Poor Law in Victorian England
Humphreys, Robert
New York: St. Martin's Press. 1995.
226pp. Illustrated, Bibliography, Index. [Victorian London]
ISBN: 0312127553

Casebook Review:

This book challenges widely-held beliefs about the efficacy of the Charity Organization Society and its alleged epitome of the Victorian values of family, morality, character and thrift. The received impression of a powerful, respected, national network of provincial Charity Organization Societies each organizing poor relief in their locality is shown to be illusory. Now that the blatant failure of the Charity Organization Society to satisfy their own guidelines on poor relief has been exposed we can ask whether they had the right to rebuke others about sin.