Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Dear Boss Letter: Are There Good Arguments Against Bullen/ing? - by Wickerman 56 seconds ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by caz 25 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Serious Suspects - by John Wheat 34 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by John Wheat 41 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - by FrankO 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by Geddy2112 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by FISHY1118 2 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by Elamarna 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (28 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: The kill ladder - (21 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - (14 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - (12 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - (9 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - (9 posts)


St. Martin's Press, 1995 (Hardcover)
Sin, Organized Charity, and the Poor Law in Victorian England
Humphreys, Robert
New York: St. Martin's Press. 1995.
226pp. Illustrated, Bibliography, Index. [Victorian London]
ISBN: 0312127553

Casebook Review:

This book challenges widely-held beliefs about the efficacy of the Charity Organization Society and its alleged epitome of the Victorian values of family, morality, character and thrift. The received impression of a powerful, respected, national network of provincial Charity Organization Societies each organizing poor relief in their locality is shown to be illusory. Now that the blatant failure of the Charity Organization Society to satisfy their own guidelines on poor relief has been exposed we can ask whether they had the right to rebuke others about sin.