Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
Other Mysteries: Hammersmith Nude Murders (Stripper) - by FriedBrotato 2 hours ago.
Other Mysteries: Madeleine McCann - by Al Bundy's Eyes 2 hours ago.
Other Mysteries: Madeleine McCann - by WallaceWackedHer 2 hours ago.
Doctors and Coroners: Dr Timothy R. Killeen - by MrBarnett 3 hours ago.
Doctors and Coroners: Dr Timothy R. Killeen - by MrBarnett 5 hours ago.
Doctors and Coroners: Dr Timothy R. Killeen - by Al Bundy's Eyes 5 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Al Bundy's Eyes 5 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Iconoclast 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (43 posts)
Doctors and Coroners: Dr Timothy R. Killeen - (11 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (6 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Hanbury Street rear - (6 posts)
Books: What's the latest news of the next edition of A-Z? - (4 posts)
A6 Murders: Mrs Dinwoodie - (3 posts)


Times (London)
20 January 1899

Central Criminal Court

At Bow street, yesterday, before Sir John Bridge, Mr. Holloway, solicitor, applied for a summons requiring the Commissioner of Police to show cause why he should not deliver to Mr. Havelock - the solicitor acting for Kate Marshall, now under sentence of death for the murder of her sister at Spitalfields - the knife with which the murder was committed. He stated that the knife had been assigned by the condemned woman to Mr. Havelock. It was not disputed that this knife was her property. Sir John Bridge said that even if he granted a summons, he should certainly not make an order for the delivery of the knife. Mr. Holloway said that lawyers who had been consulted held that this assignment constituted a valid claim for the knife. In the case of Mrs. Pearcey an order was made as to property forming the subject of a murder charge. Sir John Bridge said there could be no doubt that this solicitor wanted the knife for a certain purpose, and he considered this perfectly monstrous. In the circumstances he thought it would be wrong to give up the knife, and he should not grant a summons. The parties interested could apply to the High Court for a mandamus if they wished.


Related pages:
  Elizabeth Roberts
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 12 January 1899 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 13 January 1899 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 14 December 1898 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 25 January 1899 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 27 January 1899