Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: Did The Killer Remove Organs? - by Herlock Sholmes 4 minutes ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Herlock Sholmes 21 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Did The Killer Remove Organs? - by Herlock Sholmes 23 minutes ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Herlock Sholmes 30 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: New Ripper Book - "Secret History" - by Svensson 2 hours ago.
Non-Fiction: New Ripper Book - "Secret History" - by Simon Wood 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Bloodhounds - by c.d. 7 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - by Wickerman 7 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Catherine Eddowes: From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts. - (55 posts)
Alice Mackenzie: Open Mind - (20 posts)
Torso Killings: The Paris Torso Mystery - (16 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: A bump for the JtR Map - (5 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (4 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Number 13 Enhanced Images 2023 - (4 posts)


Times (London)
4 May 1889

THE TRIAL OF DIEMHOLZ.

Mr. C. GRAHAM asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, at the recent trial of Diemholz and Kozebrodski, Mr. Gill, who appeared for the Home Office, obtained any assent on behalf of the accused to their pleading guilty of a technical assault; and whether during the trial of Diemholz his wife was refused admittance to the Court on the plea of want of space.

Mr. MATTHEWS.-The answer to the first paragraph is in the negative. There was no plea of guilty and no consent to a plea. The constable on duty in the Court remembers a woman, who said she was a witness in the case, but did not give her name, asking to be allowed to enter the Court, and he told her, in conformity with a standing order of the Bench as to witnesses, that she could not enter until her name was called. He did not know that she was the wife of the defendant.


Related pages:
  Isaac Kozebrodsky
       Press Reports: Daily News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: London Evening News - 1 October 1888 
  Louis Diemschutz
       Press Reports: East London Advertiser - 27 April 1889 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 19 March 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 2 May 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 2 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 21 March 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 26 April 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 9 April 1889