Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
Witnesses: Was Mrs McCarthy the only witness silenced ? - by Wickerman 28 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Was Mrs McCarthy the only witness silenced ? - by seanr 1 hour ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Henry/ Harry Buckley - by FISHY1118 1 hour ago.
Witnesses: Was Mrs McCarthy the only witness silenced ? - by Wickerman 1 hour ago.
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - by cobalt 1 hour ago.
Witnesses: Was Mrs McCarthy the only witness silenced ? - by seanr 1 hour ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Henry/ Harry Buckley - by seanr 2 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Henry/ Harry Buckley - by seanr 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Goulston Street Graffito: The GSG - Did Jack write it? POLL - (72 posts)
"The Royal Conspiracy": Denial, Desperation and Dishonesty - Defending Stephen Knight’s Nonsense - (47 posts)
Kosminski, Aaron: What Makes Aaron Kosminski a Viable Suspect? - (26 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only - (18 posts)
Martha Tabram: Probibility of Martha Tabram Being a JtR Victim - (16 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: Same Name - Different Locations - (13 posts)


Times (London)
4 May 1889

THE TRIAL OF DIEMHOLZ.

Mr. C. GRAHAM asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, at the recent trial of Diemholz and Kozebrodski, Mr. Gill, who appeared for the Home Office, obtained any assent on behalf of the accused to their pleading guilty of a technical assault; and whether during the trial of Diemholz his wife was refused admittance to the Court on the plea of want of space.

Mr. MATTHEWS.-The answer to the first paragraph is in the negative. There was no plea of guilty and no consent to a plea. The constable on duty in the Court remembers a woman, who said she was a witness in the case, but did not give her name, asking to be allowed to enter the Court, and he told her, in conformity with a standing order of the Bench as to witnesses, that she could not enter until her name was called. He did not know that she was the wife of the defendant.


Related pages:
  Isaac Kozebrodsky
       Press Reports: Daily News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: London Evening News - 1 October 1888 
  Louis Diemschutz
       Press Reports: East London Advertiser - 27 April 1889 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 19 March 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 2 May 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 2 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 21 March 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 26 April 1889 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 9 April 1889