Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: Who were they? - by rjpalmer 15 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Time poll - by Al Bundy's Eyes 1 hour ago.
Non-Fiction: Book recommendations. - by Al Bundy's Eyes 1 hour ago.
Pub Talk: There'll always be an England..... - by Christian 1 hour ago.
Maybrick, James: Who were they? - by caz 1 hour ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 2 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 2 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - by Geddy2112 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Was he lying? - (17 posts)
Witnesses: Time poll - (9 posts)
Pub Talk: There'll always be an England..... - (6 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - (3 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (3 posts)
General Discussion: Sugden's Book - (2 posts)


New York Times
October 5, 1888
"The Whitechapel Murders"

London, Oct.4.-- The British Medical Journal, referring to the Whitechapel murders, says: "The Coroner's theory that the assassin's work was carried out under the impulse of a pseudo-scientific mania has been exploded by the first attempt at serious investigation. It is true that a foreign physician inquired a year ago as to the possibility of securing certain parts of the body for the purpose of scientific investigation, but no large sum was offered, and the physician in question is of the highest respectability and came exceedingly well accredited."