Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 15 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 24 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by John G 35 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by FrankO 1 hour ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 2 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 2 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 2 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - (96 posts)
General Discussion: A Whip and a Prod - (35 posts)
Other Mysteries: The Murder of Julia Wallace (1931) - Full DPP case files - (23 posts)
Pub Talk: Do Some People Really Believe the Earth Is Flat? - (12 posts)
Pub Talk: Monty Python Star Terry Jones Has Passed Away - (4 posts)
Other Mysteries: Madeleine McCann - (2 posts)


Lima Daily Democratic Times
Ohio, U.S.A.

14 November 1888

A Probable Clew
Some Hope of Catching the Whitechapel Murderer

London, Nov. 14.
The hopes of the police of catching the Whitechapel murderer, which had almost entirely died out, were raised to the acme of buoyancy yesterday in consequence of the testimony, at the Kelly inquest, of George Hutchinson, a groom, who had known the victim for some years, and who saw her with a male companion shortly before 2 o'clock on the morning of the murder.

Hutchinson testified that he was a well dressed man, with a Jewish cast of countenance, accost the woman on the street at the hour mentioned on Friday morning, and the circumstance of his acquaintance with her induced him to follow the pair as they walked together. He looked straight into the man's face as he turned to accompany the woman, and followed them to Miller court, out of mere curiosity. He had no thought of the previous murders and certainly no suspicion that the man contemplated violence, since his conspicuous manifestations of affection for his companion as they walked along, formed a large part of his incentive to keep them in sight.

After the couple entered the house Hutchinson heard sounds of merriment in the girl's room and remained at the entrance to the court for fully three quarters of an our. About 3 o'clock the sounds ceased and he walked into the court, but finding that the light in the room had been extinguished he went home. During the hour occupied in standing at the entrance to, or promenading the court, he did not see a policeman. There is every reason to believe Hutchinson's statement and the police place great reliance in his description of the man, believing that it will enable them to run him down.

The witness who testified to having seen the woman enter the house with a man with a blotched face was evidently mistaken as to the night, as his description of her companion is totally unlike that of Hutchinson in every particular. the bulk of the evidence taken fixes the time of the murder at between 3.30 and 4 o'clock. It has transpired that in addition to the facial mutilation of the murdered woman the uterus was wholly skilfully removed and laid in a corner of the bed.