Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
General Discussion: Senior Investigators-Inside Knowledge - by Wickerman 1 hour ago.
Maybrick, James: What if the watch is real but the document isn't? - by erobitha 4 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: What if the watch is real but the document isn't? - by Graham 5 hours ago.
General Discussion: Senior Investigators-Inside Knowledge - by NotBlamedForNothing 7 hours ago.
General Discussion: Senior Investigators-Inside Knowledge - by Wickerman 10 hours ago.
General Discussion: Senior Investigators-Inside Knowledge - by NotBlamedForNothing 13 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: What if the watch is real but the document isn't? - by rjpalmer 15 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: What if the watch is real but the document isn't? - by Graham 16 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Discussion: Senior Investigators-Inside Knowledge - (12 posts)
Maybrick, James: What if the watch is real but the document isn't? - (7 posts)
Pub Talk: john prine!! - (4 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Viability of Charles Cross as the Ripper - (2 posts)
Bury, W.H.: Why weren't the police interested? - (1 post)


Freeman's Journal and Daily Commercial Advertiser
Dublin, Ireland
Monday, 15th October 1888

THE WHITECHAPEL MURDERS
LETTER FROM THE HOME SECRETARY

London, Sunday

The Home Secretary has sent the following reply to Mr Lusk, of Alderney road, Mile End, in answer to his request that a free pardon might be offered to the accomplice or accomplices of the Whtiechapel murders.

October 12th,

SIR, - I am directed by the Secretary of State to thank you for the suggestions with your letter of the 7th inst. on the subject of the recent Whitechapel murders, and to say in reply that from the first the Secretary of State has had under consideration the question of granting a pardon to accomplices. It is obvious that not only must such a grant be limited to persons who have not been concerned in contriving or in actually committing the murders, but the expedience and propriety of making the offer must largely depend on the nature of the information received from day to day which is being carefully watched with a view to determine that question. With regard to the offer of a reward M Matthews has under the existing circumstances nothing to add to his former letter.
GODFREY LUSHINGTON

A person was arrested yesterday on suspicion but was again released, and no one is now in custody in connection with the murders.


Related pages:
  George Lusk
       Press Reports: Brandon Mail - 8 November 1888 
       Press Reports: British Daily Whig - 22 October 1888 
       Press Reports: City Press - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: City Press - 24 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily News - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily News - 20 September 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily Telegraph - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily Telegraph - 15 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily Telegraph - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily Telegraph - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Daily Telegraph - 8 October 1888 
       Press Reports: East London Observer - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Eastern Post - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Echo - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Echo - 8 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 8 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening Standard - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening Standard - 17 September 1888 
       Press Reports: Freemans Journal and Daily Commercial Advertiser - 8 Octo... 
       Press Reports: Manchester Guardian - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Manitoba Daily Free Press - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 13 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 15 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 3 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 8 October 1888 
       Press Reports: News of the World - 7 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Pall Mall Gazette - 15 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Pall Mall Gazette - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: St. James Gazette - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Star - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Star - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 1 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 19 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 23 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 29 April 1891 
       Press Reports: Times [London] - 8 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Walthamstow and Leyton Guardian - 20 October 1888 
       Press Reports: West Ham Guardian - 20 October 1888 
       Witnesses: Emily Marsh 
  Pardons
       Official Documents: Parliamentary Debates - November 23 1888 
       Press Reports: East London Advertiser - 17 November 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 12 November 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 15 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Evening News - 24 November 1888 
       Press Reports: Fort Wayne Gazette - 11 November 1888 
       Press Reports: Illustrated Police News - 17 November 1888 
       Press Reports: Montreal Gazette - 12 November 1888 
       Press Reports: Morning Advertiser - 24 November 1888