Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Suspects: Suspect Witnesses? - by S.Brett 6 minutes ago.
Suspects: Suspect Witnesses? - by S.Brett 47 minutes ago.
Suspects: Suspect Witnesses? - by Patrick Differ 1 hour ago.
Witnesses: Maxwell Again - by Herlock Sholmes 3 hours ago.
Druitt, Montague John: Druitt and Monro - by caz 3 hours ago.
Witnesses: Maxwell Again - by caz 5 hours ago.
Witnesses: Maxwell Again - by Doctored Whatsit 6 hours ago.
Witnesses: Maxwell Again - by Herlock Sholmes 7 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: Maxwell Again - (26 posts)
Bury, W.H.: William Bury: Jack the Ripper - (11 posts)
Pub Talk: Irritations - (7 posts)
Suspects: Suspect Witnesses? - (7 posts)
Ripper Discussions: Witnesses - (1 post)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - (1 post)


East and West Ham Gazette (U.K.)
Saturday, 24 November 1888

PUFFS AND WHIFFS.

If newsvendors in the streets call out false news, they are liable to punishment - and justly so; but should not newspaper proprietors share the same fate when they issue false and alarming reports which afterwards are contradicted? On Tuesday last in the City the evening newspapers came out with the report that "Jack the Ripper" (it should be "Jack the Slipper") had been arrested, which proved to be a canard. The Evening News seems to be the "top-sawyer" at this business, and can occasionally give the Star a "start," and that is saying a deal. But the public are getting pretty well acquainted with the sensational placards presented, and are not "caught on" as formerly; in fact the little game is nearly played out.

UBIQUE.