Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:


Most Recent Posts:
Other Mysteries: The Murder of Julia Wallace (1931) - Full DPP case files - by WallaceWackedHer 40 seconds ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Trevor Marriott 2 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Abby Normal 3 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 21 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 24 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 26 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 28 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - by Fisherman 29 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Practicality or madness? - (65 posts)
General Discussion: A Whip and a Prod - (22 posts)
Other Mysteries: The Murder of Julia Wallace (1931) - Full DPP case files - (19 posts)
Pub Talk: Do Some People Really Believe the Earth Is Flat? - (18 posts)
Pub Talk: RIP Neil Peart - (6 posts)
Other Mysteries: Madeleine McCann - (2 posts)


Daily Northwestern
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
3 October 1888

HE WOULD CATCH HIM
How Inspector Byrnes Would Work in London

New York, Oct. 3.
Inspector Byrnes talks at length on the Whitechapel murders in London. He says: "With the very large force of police under his charge Sir Charles Warren, commissioner of police of London, who under the English form of government has powers autocratic, should have been able to cover the ground so thoroughly after the second crime that the third would have been impossible, or, at least, that the capture of the perpetrator would have been inevitable. It isn't as if the murders were committed in widely separated districts, which would have made the case more difficult. The fellow even gave warning in a letter to a newspaper that he intended to kill twenty five women. One of the recent murders was committed right at the entrance to a hall where socialists held their meetings. Why did not the London police commissioner with his great powers determine the class of society to which the murderer belongs, and if he had ever committed previous crimes? If these things had been settled the mystery would have been solved. I will say unhesitatingly that the people who have charge of the police in London, with the great powers allowed them, ought by this time to be enabled to effect the arrest of the murderers. With the great power of the London police I should have manufactured victims for this murder. I would have taken fifty of the female habitués of Whitechapel and covered the ground with them. Even if one fell a victim I would get the murderer. My men, ununiformed, would be scattered over the whole district, so nothing that happened could escape them. The crimes are all of the same class, and I would have determined the class to which the murderer belonged. But pshaw! what's the use of talking; the murderer should have been caught long ago."


Related pages:
  Inspector Byrnes
       Dissertations: The New York Affair, Part II 
       Press Reports: Bismarck Daily Tribune - 11 October 1888 
       Press Reports: Star - 4 October 1888