Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Witnesses: John Richardson - by Herlock Sholmes 3 hours ago.
Witnesses: John Richardson - by GBinOz 3 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Is James Hardiman a good fit? - by GBinOz 4 hours ago.
General Discussion: Statistics and observations of whitechapel butchers from 1882 to 1891 - by Patrick Differ 7 hours ago.
Druitt, Montague John: Druitt and Monro - by Fiver 8 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: Is James Hardiman a good fit? - by Fiver 9 hours ago.
Witnesses: John Richardson - by Herlock Sholmes 11 hours ago.
Witnesses: John Richardson - by Herlock Sholmes 11 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: John Richardson - (10 posts)
Druitt, Montague John: Druitt and Monro - (6 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Is James Hardiman a good fit? - (5 posts)
Suspects: Suspect Witnesses? - (4 posts)
Martha Tabram: Martha and Poll - (2 posts)
Suspects: General Suspect Discussion - (1 post)


The City Press (London)
Wednesday, 14 November 1888

It is with great regret that I read in yesterday's Times the suggestion the Rev. Prebendary Rogers makes in regard to the unfortunate women who on account of the recent murders have been engaging so much public attention. The rector of Bishopsgate says, "All these women who ply the meretricious trade should be registered, and if need be licensed! I know the cry that will be raised against this, but I ask, are the interests of society to be sacrificed to a blatant prudery? Secondly, there should be a house to house visitation (if necessary) by the police - police dressed as the 'new police' were when they were first introduced by Sir Robert Peel, in the dress of civilians - men set apart for the work, going in and out among the people and mingling with them."