Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook


Most Recent Posts:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - by Geddy2112 12 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by Geddy2112 22 minutes ago.
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - by djw 48 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Charles Lechmere: Prototypical Life of a Serial Killer - by Hair Bear 5 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: The kill ladder - by Lewis C 6 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: The kill ladder - by The Rookie Detective 7 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - by GBinOz 8 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - by Fiver 8 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: Berner Street: No Plot, No Mystery - (27 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: The kill ladder - (21 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Bucks Row - The Other Side of the Coin. - (17 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent - (16 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Evidence of innocence - (10 posts)
Dear Boss Letter: Are There Good Arguments Against Bullen/ing? - (8 posts)


Bucks County Gazette
Bristol, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
20 June 1889

IS IT JACK THE RIPPER?

A Woman's Mutilated Remains Found Near London Be by Accident

London, June 5.
A parcel containing the lower portion of a woman's body, cut in halves, was found in the Thames at Horsley Down. Another parcel, in which were a woman's thighs, was picked up at Battersea. Both were wrapped in pieces of a woman's drawers, on which the name Fisher was marked. The trunk and thighs evidently belonged to the same, which was of a well developed person.

The remains had probably been in the water for ten days. It is feared that Jack the Ripper has again been at work.

The condition of the remains found at Horsley Down shows clearly that the woman had recently given birth to a child. It is believed that she was the victim of malpractice, and that the persons connected with the operation cut the body up in order to escape discovery. The doctors have examined the remains and declare that they could not have been in the water over twenty four hours. They think the woman was about 25 years of age.