Author: stephen miller
Sunday, 17 February 2002 - 02:38 pm |        |
Hi everyone I have created this topic because it is a favourite subject of mine though I do not profess to be an expert if anyone is unfamiliar with this murder I would suggest reading "The Killing of Julia Wallace" by Jonathan Goodman
I would like to begin by discussing the alibi of William Herbert Wallace
It seems to me that if he was going to provide himself with an alibi he need not have gone to the trouble of making the phone call to the chess club he was due to attend on Monday 19th January 1931 giving himself a reason to be out of his house the next night if he was going to murder his wife he had the perfect reason for being out of his house on the Monday by being expected at the City Cafe Liverpool to play chess
If anyone is interested please post below
from steve
 |
Author: Ally
Sunday, 17 February 2002 - 02:57 pm | |
I am interested...but unfamiliar with the case. Give me some time to read up on it. To clarify: do you think he is guilty and therefore "overdid" his alibi or that he in not guilty because he had an alibi? I am just a little confused by what you have written.
Cheers,
Ally |
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 12:36 am | |
Hi Ally What I have written will become clearer once you have read up on it I could give you a short history of the case but it would be one sided
To answer your question I think he was not guilty and the police made a mistake in not looking further afield for the culprit
from steve
/clipart{smile} |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 02:23 am | |
Hi Stephen,
You may be interested to know that the Wallace case is very famous in criminological circles and is the favourite mystery of many aficionados. It has appeared in many anthologies but the following books are devoted entirely to the case:-
The Trial of William Herbert Wallace
by W.F. Wyndham-Brown
London, Victor Gollancz, 1933
The Wallace Case
by John Rowland
London, Carroll & Nicholson, 1949
William Herbert Wallace
by F.J.P. Veale
London, Merrymeade, 1950
Two Studies in Crime
by Yseult Bridges
London, Hutchinson, 1959
(Half the book is devoted to the Wallace case).
The Killing of Julia Wallace
by Jonathan Goodman
London, George G. Harrap & Co. Ltd., 1969
Murderer Scot Free
by Robert F. Hussey
Newton Abbot, David & Charles, 1972
Wallace The Final Verdict
by Roger Wilkes
London, The Bodley Head, 1984
The Murder of Julia Wallace
by James Murphy
Liverpool, The Bluecoat Press, 2001
The last mentioned book is still in print and is probably the definitive work as the author accessed more of the official material than any of the others.
As we know Wallace was found guilty, but appealed and was released. The other 'favourite' for the murder was Richard Gordon Parry. The case was dramatised on British TV a few years ago.
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 05:21 am | |
William Herbert Wallace
(1878-1933) |
Author: Jon Eva
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 06:29 am | |
| Attempted to post picture of Richard Gordon Parry, but couldn't work out how to do it. |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 08:06 am | |
Richard Gordon Parry
(1909-1980) |
Author: Christopher T George
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 11:46 am | |
Hi, Stewart:
As usual, the resources you have are absolutely astounding. Many thanks for posting those images. As an ex-pat Liverpudlian I am of course, as you know, interested in the Wallace Case.
Others might like to know that as a classic murder mystery, the Wallace Case is covered in a number of anthology-type books on crime, e.g.,
Richard Glyn Jones, Unsolved! Classic True Murder Cases, Peter Bedrick Books, New York, 1987, in which the essay is written by noted whodunit mystery writer Dorothy L. Sayers.
This particular book also contains for better or worse an essay on Jack the Ripper by Colin Wilson, "My Search for Jack the Ripper." 
Wallace's alibi was that he was looking for Menlove Gardens East, a road that does not exist--although there are a Menlove Gardens North, South, and West. As a bit of trivia, the area gets quite a lot of tourist traffic, not because of the Wallace Case, but because John Lennon's Menlove Avenue boyhood home, now a private home, and Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane, famous in the Beatles songs, are nearby.
Best regards
Chris |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 01:09 pm | |
| By the way Chris, Wallace did it. |
Author: Christopher T George
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 01:26 pm | |
Hi, Stewart:
I knew you were going to say that. I have no real opinion on whether he did it or not, although his alibi seems far-fetched to me so that is what makes me suspicious of him. So I should think you are probably right.
Best regards
Chris George |
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 02:32 pm | |
Hi Stewart thank you for the list of books I have 2 of them
one by J Goodman and one by R Wilkes the last one by J Murphy I am waiting delivery from Amazon
The case is a favourite of mine because it really is a true life whodunnit and it was the first true murder I ever read about as for the TV Programme I missed half of it so I hope sometime that they repeat it they do for everything else
Chris
I agree his alibi does seem far fetched but if you were asked to visit an address for business would you not explore all of the options avaliable to you if you could not find that address
What I was trying to say in my first post is if Wallace intended to murder his wife he had no need of an alibi on the tuesday night when he had a perfect alibi for the monday night in that he was due to attend the City Cafe to play chess so therefore he would not have had to concoct a complicated alibi
However Tuesday night makes perfect sense for someone who knew of his business and the fact that Tuesdays was when he would have had the most money in his house from his insurance duties that someone being Parry
incidentally ther is a website by Keith Andrews which deals with this murder and casts suspision on the neighbours Mr & Mrs Jonston not very convincingly though
www.detective.mainpage.net
And thank you stewart for providing the photos
I hope you vcontinue to post under this subject because I am convinced of Wallaces innocence but of course I am also not beyond persuasion the other way
from steve
|
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 03:10 pm | |
To understand all the aspects of this top-notch mystery you have to work out how and why he did it. But he did do it. The secret is in understanding the telephone call by the mysterious 'Mr. Qualtrough' and why he made it.
As Raymond Chandler said:-
"The...case is unbeatable, it will always be unbeatable." |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 03:20 pm | |
The call box from which the message was telephoned to the City Cafe. |
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 04:08 pm | |
Hi Stewart are you saying that Parry was Qualtrough and not Wallace and that he made the telephone call to get Wallace out of the house on the Tuesday night allowing him time for a secret liason with Julia Wallace and then her husband became suspicious murdering her in a frenzy or am I on the wrong track
from steve
 |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 05:24 pm | |
Stephen,
I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that I think the murder was committed by Wallace and that Parry had nothing to do with the events surrounding the murder at all. Parry was only 22 years old at the time of the murder, whilst Julia Wallace was 54 years old.
There is probably only the one explanation of what happened that successfully answers all the apparent mysteries surrounding this case.
By the way, as well as the above books listed on the case, I have two novels based on it. They are:-
Skin For Skin
by Winifred Duke
London, Victor Gollancz Ltd, 1935, and
The Telephone Call
by John Rhode
London, Geoffrey Bles, 1948
Stewart
|
Author: Jeff Bloomfield
Monday, 18 February 2002 - 10:55 pm | |
From what I understand, Parry had a grudge against
Wallace, and murdered Mrs. Wallace in an attempt to frame
her husband. The police in Liverpool in 1931 were not
very good (there is evidence of a degree of corruption),
and were quick to jump on Wallace as a suspect. There
is nothing to suggest that Julia Wallace and Richard
Parry had a liason.
Jeff |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Tuesday, 19 February 2002 - 12:33 am | |
Jeff,
That is, more or less, the popular theory started by Wallace himself and proposed in a few of the more modern books. It is interesting to note that James Murphy in the latest study, using many contemporary documents, reaches the conclusion that Wallace murdered his wife.
Stewart |
Author: stephen miller
Tuesday, 19 February 2002 - 01:20 pm | |
Hi Stewart and Jeff I suggested the Liason theory from a comment made by Parry when he was interviewed by Roger Wilkes (if my memory serves me right) in this interview he admits going round to see Julia Wallace for singing and music sessions he said we made sweet music together I will have to check this out though
Of course what he said can be construed two ways
I still don't see the importance of the phone call to the city cafe if Wallace murdered his wife I cannot see why he could not have murdered her on the Monday when he had the alibi of attending his Chess Club at the City Cafe
cheers from steve
by the way Stewart I have a novel entitled The Last Sentence by Jonathon Goodman it too is based on this case |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Tuesday, 19 February 2002 - 04:46 pm | |
Stephen,
Yes, I have Jonathan's book too, he is an old friend of mine.
A deep understanding of the case and a knowledge of the way people behave is required to work this one out. But all the clues are there. The tapes of the Merseyside broadcast featuring Jonathan and Roger Wilkes are also very good.
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: stephen miller
Wednesday, 20 February 2002 - 12:20 am | |
Hi everyone I was wrong in my last post the reference to Julia Wallace and Parry making sweet music is attributed to Jonathan Goodman on page 192 of Wallace The Final Verdict by Roger Wilkes
However on pages 175-177 of the same book there is a short account of the interview of Parry by Jonathan Goodman witnessed by Richard Whittington Egan in this interview Parry denies murdering Julia Wallace he also states that he used to go to Wallaces house for tea when he would sing while Julia Wallace would play the piano W H Wallace knew nothing of this
just setting the record straight on what I said above
from steve
|
Author: stephen miller
Wednesday, 20 February 2002 - 12:25 am | |
Hi Stewart if as you say a deep understanding of the way people behave is one of the keys to the case I will have to study it a lot more I am still waiting for my copy of Murphys' book from amazon
as for the tapes are they avaliable on general sale if so from where.
Now if I could ask a question
Do you think Wallace had the time to commit the murder prior to his Journey to the fictitious Menlove Gardens East?
from steve
|
Author: Stewart P Evans
Wednesday, 20 February 2002 - 02:50 am | |
Stephen,
Most people miss the most obvious fact of all about the actual mechanics of the murder, and therein lies the vital clue.
The tapes are not commercially available, I obtained mine from Jonathan. Of course Wallace had time to commit the murder before setting out for 'Menlove Gardens East'. Like many complex murder cases the timing seems crucial, and it is to a degree. However, too much reliance should not be put on exact times, there were no quartz watches in those days.
By the way, I missed another small book on the case that I have in my collection. It is:-
The Insurance Man
by Richard Waterhouse
Leyburn Designs (Publishing), 1994
(500 copies only)
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Wednesday, 20 February 2002 - 05:04 am | |
Stephen,
I don't want to spoil your enjoyment of the new well-researched book that you have on order. But one of the interesting things it reveals is that Julia Wallace was two months short of 70 years of age at the time of her murder. Not the 53 years that she claimed.
Stewart |
Author: stephen miller
Wednesday, 20 February 2002 - 02:53 pm | |
Hi Stewart I began to suspect you were holding back because of my order of Murphy's bookthank you for that the main reason I ordered it was because of the research done into Julia Wallace so don't worry you have not spoiled anything at all I will get back to you here when the book arrives though Amazon do take their time delivering
at the moment I still think Wallace innocent though I have only read books supporting his innocence at the moment I am re-reading Jonathan Goodmans book so I will start to question some of the facts a little more closely
I will stop asking questions of you now until Murphys book arrives
trial of JTR on soon so it's of to the TV room for now
from steve
|
Author: stephen miller
Thursday, 14 March 2002 - 01:25 pm | |
To Stewart P Evans
Hi Stewart just thought I'd let you know that I am expecting delivery of The Murder of Julia Wallace by James Murphy I have obtained it through Clifford Elmer as Amazon were taking too long I hope you won't mind if I post a few questions here when I get to read it
best wishes.
steve
|
Author: Stewart P Evans
Thursday, 14 March 2002 - 02:04 pm | |
Steve,
Pleased to hear that you now have it ordered from the Elmers, they are very reliable and prompt and are able to supply most crime book needs. I hope that you enjoy it.
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: Lindsey C. Millar
Saturday, 16 March 2002 - 02:14 pm | |
Steve,
The Wallace case was actually my introduction to true crime many, many years ago, by way of Jon Goodman's "The Killing of Julia Wallace". I'm pleased to see this thread on the boards, and look forward to following some good discussion regarding the case!
Anyway.. some time ago Chris George very kindly sent me a mortuary photo of Julia - if you're interested, I'd be glad to send you a copy. Just let me know.
And, yes, I agree with Stewart. Even whilst reading Goodman's book all those years ago, I felt strongly that Wallace "dun it".
Regards,
Lyn |
Author: stephen miller
Sunday, 17 March 2002 - 10:00 am | |
Hi Lyn I would be most grateful to receive the photo thank you for the offer
I remember getting Goodmans' book out of the college Library and the look on the face of the librarian when she was logging it out I always feel as if people are suspicious when I buy a book on murder
I am now half way through Murphys' book now and it certainly blows the Parry theory out of the window, I could not believe the so called conspiracy by the Liverpool authorities in covering for Parry but I did think that he had a motive( robbery/ dislike of William H Wallace) and by his own admission Julia Wallace would have admitted him to the house but it does seem that he had a perfect alibi after all
I have always had trouble with Wallace being guilty due to the time factor and the motive (I know you don't need one to prove someone guilty but it helps)
anyway I'm sure Stewart and yourself will do a good job persuading me that Wallace did it
best wishes
steve
|
Author: Lindsey C. Millar
Sunday, 17 March 2002 - 11:43 am | |
Hi Steve,
..Yep, I got that same nervous look from the librarian on my first visit to our small 'one dog town' library, as I plonked all 15 of their true crime books on the counter, and then asked if they had anything else related to serial killing ;-)
Send me your mailing address via e-mail, and I'll get that copy of Julia's mortuary photo off to you.
May I ask why you feel that Wallace had no motive for Julia's murder?
Take care,
Lyn |
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 18 March 2002 - 12:22 am | |
Hi Lyn I have sent you an email thank you once again
As for the motive everything I have read so far has never explained why he would want to murder his wife and I can't think of one but Murphys' book alludes to the fact that the marriage may not have been as happy as everyone thought I am coming to the end of this book now and maybe a motive will become clear to me I must say this book has changed my mind on a few aspects of the case but I can't get away from the fact that if Wallace wanted to murder his wife he could have done it on the Monday and then gone to the Chess Club unless he made the phone call on the Monday to implicate someone else maybe Parry I will expand on that later tonight it's off to work now
see you later
best wishes
steve
|
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 18 March 2002 - 01:54 pm | |
Hi Stewart and Lyn
Assuming Wallace was Qualtrough
Do you think Wallace was implicating Parry when he made the phone call to the city cafe what makes me think he may have been are these words
When Beattie suggests he calls back later Qualtrough says
"No I can't I'm too busy I have my Girls' Twenty first birthday on"
(in murphys' book he states daughters twenty first, I have taken this quote from Goodman)
Now Girls could mean something a lot different from daughters ie Girlfriend
and part of Parrys' alibi was that he had been to see someone about a twenty first birthday
Wallace may have known about this twenty first and mentioned it to cast suspicion on Parry
all the best
steve
|
Author: Stewart P Evans
Monday, 18 March 2002 - 06:33 pm | |
Hi Steve,
No, I don't think that Wallace had Parry in mind at all as a 'fall guy' when he made the call.
Answer the mystery of the 'Qualtrough' call and you solve the mystery of the murder.
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: stephen miller
Tuesday, 19 March 2002 - 12:38 am | |
Hi Stewart I'll do a bit more thinking then
I was just wondering about the mentioning of the twenty first because to me it seems an unnecessary detail he could simply have said "I'm too busy but I need to see him as I have some business for him"
I now admit that Wallace could have done it and there are more reasons to suspect him than I first thought (the wet nail brush and the dry towel for one)
I have read somewhere that all of the lights in the house being turned off points to Wallace and not a Burglar because an intruder would not turn them off- well the people who burgled my house turned the lights off when they left so maybe they were concerned about my electric bill
all the best off to work again see you later
steve
|
Author: Lindsey C. Millar
Tuesday, 19 March 2002 - 12:56 am | |
Hi Steve,
Nope, I don't think that Wallace was trying to frame Parry. I have to agree with Stewart there.
Note that (hoping I'm remembering correctly) the Qualtrough phone call was made (or received) before Wallace arrived at the chess club.
My own opinion is that Wallace could easily have made the phone call himself.
Some links of interest:
http://www.gallagher4471.freeserve.co.uk/murder.htm
http://www.microwaredata.co.uk/murder-uk/bookhtml_w/wallace_wh00.html
..And one for CG:
http://www.geocities.com/stevenhortonuk/liverpoolmurders.html
A copy of Julia's mortuary pic will be on its way to you first thing tomorrow 
Take care,
Lyn |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Tuesday, 19 March 2002 - 02:19 am | |
Hi Steve,
The mention of a '21st birthday' was not an unusual thing in an insurance context. It was the 'coming of age' and often meant that appropriate insurance policies were taken out, usually as savings plans. Of course, the call was made by Wallace himself while he was on his way to the chess club.
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: stephen miller
Tuesday, 19 March 2002 - 01:09 pm | |
Hi Lyn & Stewart I am beginning to suspect he did make the phone call and of course committed the murder
Stewart if I have not worked out the mystery by the weekend I will ask you to explain you are probably about to discover that I would never have made a detective
Now another question to you both do you think Wallace wore the mackintosh or did Julia wear it over her shoulders I lean towards Wallace/ Qualtrough wearing it because of the blood on the inside of the sleeve
Lyn I will try those sites tomorrow but here is another I don't even know how I found it or who created it look forward to receiving the photo thank you
www.intermundia.hu/info/spec3en.htmlall the best
steve
|
Author: stephen miller
Saturday, 23 March 2002 - 03:43 am | |
To Stewart P Evans
Hi Stewart I give up explain the solution to me my girlfriend is complaining that I am reading the same book over and over again she thinks I've gone crazy
What does strike me as odd though is when Qualtrough is connected to the City Cafe he asks
"Is that the Central Chess Club" surely he should have said
"Is that The City Cafe"
I admit Wallace had the opportunity and time to make the phone call and get to the City Cafe when he did as for the murder there are a lot of little things that point to Wallace but could also point to an intruder
I think that the Mackintosh is the answer but I can't work it out
I do have a little scenario in my head and it is this
As Murphy states in his book Wallace had began to resent Julia for her slovenly ways and probably her age (if he knew about this it may have felt like living with his mother)
He makes some excuse to get her into the parlour he then goes upstairs undresses puts his Mackintosh on comes down and strikes her with an Iron bar or something similar she falls against the fire and scorches her skirt he goes over to get her away from the fire and while he is doing this his Mackintosh is burnt he then hits her again and again and then begins to clean himself and go to find Qualtrough
the burglary evidence could have been staged before all of this
One more question why does he murder Julia in the Parlour he could have done this in any other room unless he had to make it look like a visitor had done it
look forward to hearing from you
all the best
steve |
Author: Stewart P Evans
Saturday, 23 March 2002 - 06:07 pm | |
Hi Steve,
Despite researching and writing an excellent book, Murphy hasn't quite worked out exactly what happened. He certainly realises that Wallace did it, but not how he did it and why.
I believe that Wallace was wearing the raincoat when he killed her, but was not naked under that. Obviously getting it bloodstained when he killed her he was obliged to put it under her and wear a different coat. I think the fact that they were in the front room was probably to do with the logistics of the house. I think that they were having an argument and that the front room was the one room where the neighbours, especially the Johnstons, were least likely to hear them.
It's a fairly complicated scenario but, as far as I can see, the only one that really fits the facts. I will possibly write an article on it one day.
Best Wishes,
Stewart |
Author: stephen miller
Sunday, 24 March 2002 - 04:23 am | |
Hi Stewart I hope you do write something on this case it would be very interesting
But what about the phone call by Qualtrough you said earlier that if you unravel this mystery you solve the murder?
Now Mrs Johnston said that Julias body was slightly warm when she held her hand do you think it possible that the fire was left on to keep the body temperature up and Wallace went into the house to turn the fire off before going out again to pretend that he could not get in
Since reading Murphys' book I realise that there are more reasons to suspect Wallace than I had thought it would be useful to have access to his diaries rather than the few quotes we have from them
I do agree with Murphy though that he led her into the front room under a ruse and then maybe he started the argument you mention
all the best
steve
|
Author: stephen miller
Sunday, 24 March 2002 - 10:37 am | |
Hi Stewart
If you do publish something what are the chances of a sourcebook along side it?
Could you please give me some advice
How do I go about obtaining the records of a murder by that I mean Police files & trial transcript email me privately if you wish
thank you
from steve
|
Author: stephen miller
Thursday, 28 March 2002 - 11:27 am | |
Hi Lyn
The Photo of Julia Wallace in Liverpool Mortuary arrived today thank you very much
from steve
|
Author: Lindsey C. Millar
Thursday, 28 March 2002 - 08:56 pm | |
Steve,
You're most welcome! Glad it arrived safely.
Lyn |
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 01 April 2002 - 01:41 pm | |
Hi Lyn & Stewart Just letting you know my position on this subject now that I have read James Murphys' book
Previously I had been of the opinion that Wallace did not have much of a case to answer but now I'm not so sure
THE QUALTROUGH TELEPHONE CALL
Wallace had the opportunity and the time to make this call but I can't see anything more to tie him to it
But I do consider it strange that the caller said "Is that the Central Chess Club" and not "Is that the City Cafe" maybe members of the Chess Club referred to it as the former
THE ARRIVAL OF WALLACE AT CITY CAFE
We do not know for certain at what time Wallace arrived at the City Cafe but James Caird arrived there at 7-35pm before Wallace, now these two lived close to one another indeed they made their way home together yet they did not see each other on their journey to the Cafe maybe they took different routes or different modes of transport but it would be interesting to find out at what time Mr Caird set off on his journey
WALLACE'S ATTEMPTS TO FIND MENLOVE GARDENS EAST
It has been said that Wallace was trying to make himself memorable by his persistent mentioning of his destination on the trams but this leaves himself wide open to being told that the address does not exist thus making the rest of his journey pointless
However once he arrives at the Menlove Avenue area he does seem to overdo his attempts at finding this ficticious address
WALLACE'S RETURN TO WOLVERTON STREET
His attempts to gain entry to his house may have been staged to attract the attention of his neighbours thereby giving himself witnesses to his arrival
INSIDE THE HOUSE
In the middle bedroom was an ornamental jar containing money this points to the absence of a thief because surely a thief would have ransacked the house but also if Wallace intended to stage a burglary surely he would have removed this money the burglary could have been staged before the murder
The front bedroom was in some disorder with the bedclothes half off the bed and hats and handbags on the bed Wallace said that he had not been in this room for a while so could not comment if it had been disturbed this points to honesty on his behalf he could just as easily said that when he left this room was not in this disorderly state
The cash box in the kitchen was found in its' usual place indicating that a thief was not present as a thief would not have returned it to its' proper position also Julia's handbag is on a chair again indicating that a thief was not in the house
THE MACKINTOSH
I now believe the murderer wore the mackintosh my reason for this are the bloodstains on the inside of the sleeves this points heavily towards Wallace as the culprit because I find it inconceivable that an intruder would have worn this coat
However unless Wallace was naked underneath the Mackintosh I don't see how he avoided getting blood at least on his trousers
In the bathroom were a grimy but dry towel and a damp nailbrush Wallace said that he washed himself before going out so you would have thought that a wet towel would have been found Murphy is probably correct in his assumption that the murder weapon was concealed in the towel that the murderer used to clean himself up with and then he dumped the towel and the weapon
If I have missed anything please let me know
I now consider that Wallace does have a case to answer and with a plausible motive put for ward by Murphy(Resentment) of I believe Wallace may well have committed this murder |
Author: stephen miller
Tuesday, 11 June 2002 - 12:12 pm | |
Hi again Martin
I really do recommend that you read The Murder of Julia Wallace by James Murphy
There are some facts in there which may surprise you as Stewart P Evans has said above Murphy has had access to the official records this access has been denied to other authors
I am not fully convinced of Wallaces' guilt but I now have more doubts about his innocence than when I read J Goodmans excellent book
As for Parry well read Murphys' book and let me know what you think.
from steve |
Author: Martin Fido
Tuesday, 11 June 2002 - 03:19 pm | |
Hi Stephen,
I'll look out for it. And reserve comments on your points so far until I've read it.
All the best,
Martin F |
Author: stephen miller
Monday, 24 June 2002 - 01:22 pm | |
Hi Everyone this message is to alert you all that "The Killing of Julia Wallace" by Jonathan Goodman is up for auction on ebay
It is an excellent book and well worth buying
all the best
by the way this is not a personal plug I am not the seller
steve
|
Author: Christopher T George
Monday, 24 June 2002 - 02:02 pm | |
Hi, Steve:
Thanks. I am now reading another book by good book by Jonathan Goodman, The Passing of Starr Faithful, so I might put a bid in on his Wallace book!
All the best
Chris |
