Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

 Search:



** This is an archived, static copy of the Casebook messages boards dating from 1998 to 2003. These threads cannot be replied to here. If you want to participate in our current forums please go to https://forum.casebook.org **

Mile end

Casebook Message Boards: General Discussion: General Topics: Mile end
Author: Philip Rayner
Tuesday, 21 January 2003 - 03:31 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
In an attempt to marry my two main passions together I would ask for the help of you my dear JTR buddies.

I have mentioned that I had a relative who may have lived close to the East end or even in it in 1881. I know he had moved by 1901 to lambeth but he may well have lived in Mile end old town at the time of the murders.

This is where you come in. Has anyone access to a map of about 1870-1890 which would give me a clearer picture of where he lived.

I know it was in Mile end old town and the address was 42 Rowsell street. Mile end new town is located just to the north of Hanbury street and I think from that I can place it roughly but it'd be good to know where it really was.

This is a shameless attempt to further my genealogy research via these august boards but I'm sure you'll agree that it would be nice to have a relative who may have had personal experience of the area in the 1880's. Maybe a modern relative has some photo or document with an even closer connection. As far as I can tell he was literate and somewhat of a photographer at the turn of the century so who knows? He may have left some record. My wife is convinced that I inherited my interest in the Ripper genetically from him. In her zanier moments she is convinced he was the Ripper!

If I do find anything of interest I will of course share it with you my freinds.

Phil

Author: chris scott
Tuesday, 21 January 2003 - 05:57 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Phil
If you look in the Online Resources board (under general discussion) Ive posted a lot of links to sites with old maps that may help
Chris Scott

Author: stephen miller
Wednesday, 22 January 2003 - 04:27 am
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Hi Philip what was your ancestor's name?
best wishes
steve

Author: David Jetson
Wednesday, 22 January 2003 - 06:31 am
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
I think what we all want to know here is can you definately prove your ancestor wasn't Jack? Right place, right (approximate) time - good enough for some to consider him a viable suspect.

Nah, just kidding you ;-)

Author: Philip Rayner
Wednesday, 22 January 2003 - 02:33 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Chris, thank you.

Stephen, Robert Rayner b1855 died 1928. Born in Peckham.

David, damn you guessed? Knowing some of the more radical members of this site, I wouldn't be surprised if someone tried to make a case of it.

Phil

Author: chris scott
Wednesday, 22 January 2003 - 06:26 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Hi Philip
Ive found your guy in the 1881 census - it gives year of birth as 1857 though
Details are:

Address:
42 Rowsell St
London, Middlesex, England

Robert RAYNER Head M Male 24 Peckham, Surrey, England Letter Carrier Post Office

Ann H. RAYNER Wife M Female 23 Pimlico, Middlesex, England

Ann M. RAYNER Daur U Female 3 Pimlico, Middlesex, England Scholar

William R. RAYNER Son U Male 2 Bow, Middlesex, England

Charlotte M. RAYNER Daur U Female 6 m Bow, Middlesex, England

Hope this helps
Chris S

Author: Joe Gibson
Wednesday, 22 January 2003 - 06:30 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
The only Rowsell Street listed in "Victorian London Streets" was located in Stepney -- see here:

http://www.gendocs.demon.co.uk/lonstr_r.html

It still existed in 1940 according to my copy of Bartholomew's Map of London published in that year (postal district E3). It seems to have disappeared as a result of wartime bombing or post-war development. I've taken the liberty of e-mailing a scan of the relevant section to you as the file is sizeable (755Kb). Hope that's OK. Rowsell Street lay just to the West of the junction of Bow Common Road and St Paul's Road. Those roads still exist so you ought to be able to find the rough area in which it was located on a modern A to Z.

Author: Philip Rayner
Thursday, 23 January 2003 - 01:50 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Wow
Thanks to everyone for the help. Chris, I have the 1881 location and the 1901 location. He was married twice and this may have been why he moved but I wanted to establish 1 if he was in the east end in 1888 2 When he moved.

Even so it is very kind of everyone to take the trouble.

Thanks
Phil

Author: chris scott
Thursday, 23 January 2003 - 05:50 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Philip
Rowsell Street was definitely in Stepney and this site

http://website.lineone.net/~fight/Stepney/

the site is called Old Stepney for family history
There is a theatrical family named Rayner mentioned
Search on opening screen under RAYNER
All the best
Chris

Author: stephen miller
Friday, 24 January 2003 - 05:32 am
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Hi Chris I don't doubt that you are correct but in 1891 census Rowsell St is in Parliamentary Division of Mile End RG12/313 F70 P30
All The Best
steve

Author: Mark Andrew Pardoe
Friday, 24 January 2003 - 09:44 am
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
Whatho Philip,

Did Robert do a spot of painting and have shifty eyes?

Cheers, interested Mark who wants to write a book using ludicrous non-facts.

Author: Philip Rayner
Friday, 24 January 2003 - 03:14 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
The 1881 census also lists it as Mile end old town. That was my source for the address but London boundaries are always troublesome.

Author: Philip Rayner
Friday, 24 January 2003 - 03:26 pm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  Click here to view profile or send e-mailClick here to edit this post
and Mark, he had a distinct limp, was a known impressionist, (Did a very good sooty I believe!) and had DNA matching the rest of the known universe. Damn Cornwell could make a case of this.

Phil


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password:

 
 
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation