Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

A clue left at the crime scene Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » Victims » Mary Jane Kelly » A clue left at the crime scene « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through July 16, 2005Sandy50 7-16-05  11:24 am
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Suzi Hanney
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Suzi

Post Number: 2774
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Saturday, July 16, 2005 - 6:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Sandy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pick up the NEW thread and see what you think!!!!!!!!! will email you!!!!!
Suzi
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Suzi Hanney
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Suzi

Post Number: 2775
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Saturday, July 16, 2005 - 6:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Right!! Glenn
Thanks are we all on the same thread now or what?
Suzi
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Clack
Chief Inspector
Username: Rclack

Post Number: 598
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Sunday, July 17, 2005 - 1:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi all,

I remembered this from 'The Globe' 16th February 1891. A reporter describes a visit to the convict's office department at Scotland Yard (Black Museum?). Part of the article said

"a hatchet by the door... used by the Whitechapel murderer to hack and disfigure the first (sic) poor girl who fell victim to his fiendish fury in Dorset Street"


Don't know how reliable that report is though, or whether Mary had her own kitchen utensils lying around.

Rob
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sandy
Sergeant
Username: Sandy

Post Number: 40
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Sunday, July 17, 2005 - 5:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Rob,
I am not sure about the reputation of "The Globe", but some say that JtR is responsible for the start of what is known as "yellow journalism". I do know that after studying numerous newspaper articles of the time, there were a great deal of errors concerning the case. A lot of these mistakes were basically about what could be considered small details. However, in a case like this (or even any case), any detail is anything but small, so I would be cautious with mentions of "a hatchet by the door". What I am willing to do, is after the weekend is over, going through the different articles again and see how many times there is a mention of a hatchet. Perhaps it would also help to do a bit of research on "The Globe" as well to see what type of newspaper they are (were?). Anyway, this would be an interesting angle to look into, if anything else to prove whether or not this little tidbit deserves any real attention or not. Thanks for the info.!
Sandy
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Clack
Chief Inspector
Username: Rclack

Post Number: 601
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Sunday, July 17, 2005 - 6:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Sandy,

I think it is usually best to treat newspaper reports with some caution until you can get additional verification, preferably from official sources. I suppose after all this time a 'Black Museum' inventory is out of the question.
As far as I am aware, the only mention of a hatchet is in 'The Globe' which I believe is a Canadian newspaper.

All the best

Rob
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sandy
Sergeant
Username: Sandy

Post Number: 42
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Sunday, July 17, 2005 - 10:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Rob,
Thanks again for the info. I will try to look more into this on Monday. Yes, you are quite correct that newspaper reports need to be taken with some caution. If I find anything more on the hatchet, I will post it, though I really don't think it is mentioned anywhere else. Strange though, that they would have put that in. I wonder if they ever had to do a retraction later...could be interesting.
Sandy
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MattyB
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, July 18, 2005 - 5:40 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Sandy,

Yes, I agree, you're probably right about the absence of the knife. It would be incredible if the police missed it, and I would be astonished if they did. I was referring in truth to the way in which suspects and other aspects of the case are often cast aside simply because 'the police don't seem to have suspected him'.

I was merely suggesting that I find this kind of reasoning rather nonsensical. Even the police today, with their DNA profiling and forensic capabiltites, not to mention CCTV and so on and so forth, still arrest the wrong person from time to time and let the guilty man go free.

So the idea that a man like Barnett was 100% innocent on the basis that Abberline interviewed him but was impressed by his testimony and didn't suspect him means nothing at all in my opinion.

Incidentally, I do not have a 'prime suspect' and am using Barnett as an example of a suspect often dismissed in Ripper circles for the reasons stated above.

Back to the knife, briefly! Could it not be that police reports/files are incomplete? Do we know everything that was found at every crime scene for certain? Could something like that have been reported separately? Filed away?

Again, I restate that YES, I do doubt that there was a weapon of any sort at the scene of Kelly's murder. But do we really know as much as perhaps we think we do?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mr Poster
Unregistered guest
Posted on Monday, July 18, 2005 - 7:37 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hello

Was there not some mention by a friend of Melvin Harris who was a surgeon that a hatchet must have been used to split the femur or something?

Mr Poster
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sandy
Sergeant
Username: Sandy

Post Number: 46
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 - 10:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Matty,
I do not believe that we have all of the police records concerning the case. Hasn't there been mention before that a great deal of information is "lost"? It is frustrating to realize that there could be more information out there somewhere that may answer a lot of questions that surround this case. I am sure that the police made their share of mistakes in the investigation, however just as you mentioned, I do not believe that the police would have missed the presence of a knife. That would be absurd.
Sandy
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Diana
Chief Inspector
Username: Diana

Post Number: 706
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Wednesday, July 27, 2005 - 7:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I don't think that the object on the table was a knife and I agree that the police wouldn't have missed it.

However, there is one factor to take into consideration here. We have all looked at those pictures so many times that the initial shock value has largely worn off. Moreover we are looking at grainy old photographs not the real thing.

The police that went into that room said afterward that even though they were experienced and had seen awful things before, this one topped anything they had ever seen in terms of emotional impact.

Consider for a moment the effect that extreme emotional upset can have on intellectual function. It is possible that they might have missed something because they were so horrified and trying not to throw up.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.