Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
About the Casebook

 Search:
 

Join the Chat Room!

Factual Errors Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Message Boards » General Discussion » Factual Errors « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Malcolm Bland
Unregistered guest
Posted on Friday, January 06, 2006 - 9:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Having read several Patricia Cornwell novels I had looked forward to "Portrait of a Killer". However, whereas I have to accept her American information as accurate [knowing no better], I have been dismayed by her basic errors of fact in this English story.

On the very first page she refers to the bells of St George's Chapel, Windsor, ringing all day. St George's Chapel has no bells! It was intended to hang bells in 1477 in a great central tower over the new chapel but the chapel tower was never built. There are bells across Horseshoe Cloister, in the Curfew Tower, and they may have been rung for a bank holiday, but not all day! The tenor bell in that tower weighs 26cwt. Try swinging that through 360 degrees all day!

On page 28 she states "The City of London ... can be traced back to 1 A.D. when the Romans founded the city..." Caesar mades his first tentative excursion to Britain in August of 55 BC. He left in September but tried agian the following year with little more success and left again the same year. Nearly a century passed before the British were troubled again. The Roman invasion and conquest came in 43 A.D. and the city of London was established circa 50 - 60 A.D.

Page 62. We never had "First Class Honors" in the matricuation Exams, though you could pass with honour.

Alright, so I'm picking up small errors, but such inaccuracies undermine confidence in the rest of the book. What other errors are there which I have taken for fact?

I've only reached page 78 so far and I am detecting strong bias and some very suspect conclusions.

Has anyone else noted errors of fact in this book?

Malcolm Bland
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dan Norder
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Dannorder

Post Number: 1102
Registered: 4-2004
Posted on Sunday, January 08, 2006 - 6:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Hi Malcolm,

Yes, the book is just loaded with factual errors, and then a number of things that are facts but taken completely out of context to try to make them sound totally different from reality, plus heaps of unsupported speculation presented as if they were facts, and a conspicuous lack of mention of well known facts that would poke holes in her theory had she included them.

If you'd like to see some of these discussed, there's the section of this message board about her book, the section of the board specifically about her suspect, and the main Sickert suspect page, which has links to several dissertations on the topic.
Dan Norder, Editor
Ripper Notes: The International Journal for Ripper Studies
 Profile    Email    Dissertations    Website
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thomas C. Wescott
Chief Inspector
Username: Tom_wescott

Post Number: 549
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Sunday, January 08, 2006 - 9:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Malcolm,

You're better off just enjoying 'Portrait of a Killer' as another of her fiction novels. Cornwell has yet to write a non-fiction book.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glenn G. Lauritz Andersson
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Glenna

Post Number: 4316
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Sunday, January 08, 2006 - 9:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Ha, Tom! Good one.

Couldn't have said it better myself.
G. Andersson, writer/historian
-----
"It's a BEAUTIFUL day - watch some bastard SPOIL IT."
Sign inside the Griffin Inn in Bath
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Howard Brown
Assistant Commissioner
Username: Howard

Post Number: 1341
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Sunday, January 08, 2006 - 9:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Ditto Tom...good shot.

Nice job with providing links,Dan. An effort appreciated.

Mr.Bland: Her "American information" has fallen on hard times as of late. Recently she spent a lot of money for an ad in a British paper and despite the bold claim of her book's title, Case Closed, has admitted more work needs to be done in researching Sickert.

I'm reminded of her every morning,Mr. Bland. I see her fiction books at a local convienience store prominently displayed in big letters.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Register now! Administration

Use of these message boards implies agreement and consent to our Terms of Use. The views expressed here in no way reflect the views of the owners and operators of Casebook: Jack the Ripper.
Our old message board content (45,000+ messages) is no longer available online, but a complete archive is available on the Casebook At Home Edition, for 19.99 (US) plus shipping. The "At Home" Edition works just like the real web site, but with absolutely no advertisements. You can browse it anywhere - in the car, on the plane, on your front porch - without ever needing to hook up to an internet connection. Click here to buy the Casebook At Home Edition.